🐶 Perbedaan Hdd 5400Rpm Dengan 7200Rpm

Benarkahjika Harddisk 7200rpm lebih ngebut dan lebih kencang ketimbang HDD 5400rpm? terutama ketika diajak untuk transfer file maupun loading game? Apakah l Typically the more the hard drive RPM, the faster the hard disk. Therefore, 7200 RPM hard drives are usually faster than 5400 RPM hard drives. For a 7200 RPM hard drive, the time required for each revolution is 60 × 1000 ÷ 7200 = 8.33 milliseconds, and the average rotation latency time is 8.33 ÷ 2 = 4.17 milliseconds. Hi I'm going to build a new PC with 128gb SSD, but that's just not large enough to hold all my games etc. I have an old laptop with 750gb HDD and its specs are 5400 rpm with 8mb cache, so it's basically the slowest possible HDD. I got around 50mb/s write and read speeds with Atto disk benchmark Tehnologija tip: Intel® Centrino® procesor tehnologija sa Intel® Core™2 Duo procesorom T6400, Intel® GM45 Express skupom čipova i Intel® WiFi Link 5100 radni takt: 2.00 G Tidak ada penahanan dokumen aslinya dikembalikan saat itu juga. -- TERSEDIA TENOR 10 BULAN DENGAN BUNGA LEBIH RINGAN. -Laptop Acer ES1-132 DUAL CORE N3350 RAM 2GB HDD 500GB INTEL HD GRAPHIC LAYAR 11.6 HARGA : 3.400.000 DP. 680.000-Laptop acer ES1-431 Dual core N3050 Ram 2Gb Hdd 500Gb intel HD Graphic Layar 14 Harga : 3.700.000 Dp. 740.000 Ryzen3 Pro 3200GE: September 30, 2019 12nm 4 (4) 3 Dynamic frequency scaling is a technology that allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under a light load Specs: Ryzen 3 3200g 2 + AVX + AVX2 + AES + AMD SVM + RdRand + FSGSBASE + BMI2 in i5 9400f is inr 2000 or 30$ less than ryzen 3 3200g in i5 9400f is inr 2000 or 30$ less than ryzen 3 3200g. 3W(Leerlauf) Hard Disk Drives (HDD) Testberichte Günstig kaufen 5" Garansi Resmi 3 Tahun WD 3TB My Passport Wireless Pro Portable External Hard Drive - iOS/Android Compatible - Wi-Fi AC, SD, USB 3 western digital wd40ezrx [4tb sata600]全国各地のお店の価格情報がリアルタイムにわかるのは価格 Western Digital has started shipping its newest and largest hard drive XdKXa. You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites should upgrade or use an alternative browser. 1 If you were to use a 5400RPM or 7200RPM HDD for your bootup/primary drive with the OS on it, would it make a big difference in start up? I currently run games from a Samsung 5400RPM HDD and they load up pretty quick MUCH quicker than my 360 haha However I don't know how this would be with the OS. Cheers, Primordial genesis Aug 28, 2005 15,926 10 70,865 3 I don't need recommendations, I just need to know the difference between the 2 for the OS and primary drive. I'm currently am using a 500GB 7200RPM Drive and I have no complaints really for the start up, It is what it is, it's not painfully slow but it's not SSD like quick. I'll be leaving this 500GB Drive in here but taking out my 2TB 5400RPM Samsung HDD and that's why I'm asking, I'm thinking of using that as the primary drive. Jan 1, 2014 1,646 2 20,165 5 The higher the RPM, the quicker the drive is able to access and load files. Use the 7200RPM drive as the system drive and use the 5400RPM hard drive for games and all your other stuff files. Similar threads Advertising Cookies Policies Privacy Term & Conditions Higher revolutions per minute represent a faster hard drive, but the rate of media transfer is just as important for data storage solutions. IBM gets the credit for inventing the concept of the hard disc drive HDD more than 50 years ago. Back then, HDD technology included washing machine-sized monstrosities with platters up to 14 inches in diameter spinning at a mere 1,200 revolutions per minute RPM. Since then, the industry has experienced dramatic innovation. The physical footprint of hard drives has continued to decrease while storage density and performance have dramatically increased. But even as hard drive technology has matured, the way of measuring the performance of new hard drive models has remained relatively consistent and closely related to two specificationsThe density of bits storage on the circular platters — called areal densityThe speed at which the platters rotate — called RPM The performance of a hard drive is most effectively measured by how fast data can be transferred from the spinning media platters through the read/write head and passed to a host computer. This is commonly referred to as data throughput and usually measured in gigabytes or gigabits per second. In either case, data throughput is directly related to how densely data is packed on the hard drive platters and how fast these platters spin. Comparing measurement methods For the areal density specification, we can measure data density on a hard drive in two ways bits per inch BPI and tracks per inch TPI. As tracks are placed closer together, TPI increases. Similarly, as data bits are placed closer and closer to each other along a track, BPI increases. Together, these represent areal density. As a rule, when areal density increases on a hard drive, so does data throughput performance. This is because the data bits pass by the read/write head of the hard drive faster, which leads to faster data rates. For the RPM specification, platters need to spin faster to increase performance in a hard drive. This results in moving the data bits past the read/write head faster, which results in higher data rates. Hard drives have been engineered with spin rates as low as 1,200 RPM and as high as 15K RPM. But today’s most common RPM rates, in both laptop and desktop PCs, are between 5,400 and 7,200 RPM. Given two identically designed hard drives with the same areal densities, a 7,200 RPM drive will deliver data about 33% faster than the 5,400 RPM drive. Consequently, this specification is important when evaluating the expected performance of a hard drive or when comparing different HDD models. Solid state hybrid drives make RPM largely irrelevant It’s no surprise that when many people begin evaluating the expected performance of the new solid state hybrid drive SSHD technology, they look at the RPM specification since an SSHD is basically an HDD with a bit of solid state technology integrated into the device. So RPM should still matter, right? The truth is, the RPM of an SSHD device is largely irrelevant. Here’s why SSHD design is based on identifying frequently used data and placing it in the solid state drive SSD or NAND flash portion of the drive. NAND flash media is very fast, partly because there are no moving parts — since it’s made of solid state circuitry. Therefore, when data is requested by host computers there is typically not a dependence on pulling this data directly from the spinning media in the hard drive portion. Sometimes, however, data will be requested that is not in the NAND flash, and only during these instances does the hard drive portion of the device become a bottleneck. Since the technology is so effective at identifying and storing frequently used data in the NAND area, SSHD technology is much more efficient in delivering data to a host computer quickly. This result may be clearly observed by comparing the PC Mark Vantage storage scores of second- and third-generation Seagate SSHD technology and traditional 5,400 and 7,200 RPM HDDs. Although third–generation SSHD technology is based on a 5,400 RPM HDD platform, the technology actually delivers faster performance than the previous generation product based on a 7,200 RPM HDD platform. Improvements in core SSHD technology and NAND flash systems explain such progress, and also exemplify why RPM is no longer as meaningful when evaluating SSHD technology. Summary When maximising the performance of your laptop computer, you don’t have to be bound by older storage technologies or performance criteria. Instead, let solid state hybrid drives take your digital lifestyle to a higher level. 1 Hello, I am upgrading a family member's old laptop and I have a few 5400rpm SSHDs and 7200rpm HDDs lying around. Which would be better for ordinary day to day use? This person doesn't play games and doesn't transfer a lot of large files often. Just internet usage and occasional movies. The options I have are 1 used Seagate SSHD with 5400 rpm speed ST500LM000 and 2 new HGST HDD 7200 rpms HTS725050A7 or new Toshiba HDD 7200 rpm MQ01ACF050 According to userbenchmark, the HDD is effectively faster as sequential read/write is weighted much more heavily. But youtube reviews/tests seem to prefer the SSHD. According to Seagate, their SSHD is better no surprise? Last edited Oct 17, 2018 2 Those seagates have never really been reliable at all... Either go full ssd or go home. If an ssd is not an option then take the Toshiba. Their drives are pretty good 3 SSHDs are like a oversize cache cost solution. Bulk of operations will still be reliant on how fast the platter rotates and head actuates. Since they aint gaming, go with the cheapest option which is the Toshiba Drive, which still has a faster rotation than the Seagate. 4 Those seagates have never really been reliable at all... Either go full ssd or go home. If an ssd is not an option then take the Toshiba. Their drives are pretty good Are you saying seagates in general are unreliable or just their SSHDs are reliable? When you say unreliable, do you mean high failure rates? I already have these SSHDs and HDDs. SSHDs are like a oversize cache cost solution. Bulk of operations will still be reliant on how fast the platter rotates and head actuates. Since they aint gaming, go with the cheapest option which is the Toshiba Drive Cost is not a factor because I already have both lying around. Which is better in real world applications for a person who just browses Google Chrome and uses a few programs like media player and microsoft office? We're not dealing with a lot of large files here so these commonly used programs should be on the SSD cache right? 5 Are you saying seagates in general are unreliable or just their SSHDs are reliable? When you say unreliable, do you mean high failure rates? I already have these SSHDs and HDDs. Cost is not a factor because I already have both lying around. Drop the 5400 in and call it a day. The only way a 7200 drive gets better is when a 7200 sshd is in place. Drawback of a 7200 drive over a 5400 is power. 6 Of those choices, I would go with 7200 RPM. Moderately fast and reliable. The SSHD has 8 GB of moderately fast data access followed by 500 GB of painfully slow. If you hammer an SSHD with a lot of operations, that painfully slow will rear its ugly head. 7 Of those choices, I would go with 7200 RPM. Moderately fast and reliable. The SSHD has 8 GB of moderately fast data access followed by 500 GB of painfully slow. If you hammer an SSHD with a lot of operations, that painfully slow will rear its ugly head. Not that bad for a general purpose laptop, only bad for a Gaming unit 8 Question is what OS are you going to be running? Windows 10? if so you need the fastest drive possible as its a dog of an OS when its run on a 5400 or even any type of Mechanical Hard Drive, but between the two id go 7200 for sure. If its Windows 7 you can get away with running it on ether 5400 or 7200 but again the 7200 would be still the better choice regardless. If you can afford it and im sure you could if you live in USA and your running Windows 10 on it then go get a $35 SSD and your golden. Personally I wouldnt go for any of those Drives, Seagate, Toshiba and HGST have all bad reps, I see them come through my shop dead all the time, go WD if you want a good Mechanical HDD WD BLACK , or a known name branded SSD. 9 Question is what OS are you going to be running? Windows 10? if so you need the fastest drive possible as its a dog of an OS when its run on a 5400 or even any type of Mechanical Hard Drive, but between the two id go 7200 for sure. If its Windows 7 you can get away with running it on ether 5400 or 7200 but again the 7200 would be still the better choice regardless. If you can afford it and im sure you could if you live in USA and your running Windows 10 on it then go get a $35 SSD and your golden. Personally I wouldnt go for any of those Drives, Seagate, Toshiba and HGST have all bad reps, I see them come through my shop dead all the time, go WD if you want a good Mechanical HDD WD BLACK , or a known name branded SSD. Here is a comprehensive list. 10 Question is what OS are you going to be running? Windows 10? if so you need the fastest drive possible as its a dog of an OS when its run on a 5400 or even any type of Mechanical Hard Drive, but between the two id go 7200 for sure. If its Windows 7 you can get away with running it on ether 5400 or 7200 but again the 7200 would be still the better choice regardless. If you can afford it and im sure you could if you live in USA and your running Windows 10 on it then go get a $35 SSD and your golden. Personally I wouldnt go for any of those Drives, Seagate, Toshiba and HGST have all bad reps, I see them come through my shop dead all the time, go WD if you want a good Mechanical HDD WD BLACK , or a known name branded SSD. 1 Wouldn't running the OS be faster on the SSHD cache? 2 W7 3 Backblaze statistics show Toshiba and HGST both had comparable or lower rates of failure than Western Digital drives...and HGST has been owned by WD for a while anyways. Last edited Oct 17, 2018 11 I would say generally mechanical hdd in laptop fail pretty quickly with heavy use. I have an acer laptop with Toshiba HDD yet that drive fail. HDD are not really tolerant to heat and shock of carrying day to day at least from my experience. Laptop drive bay design and shock reducing features do play a part., despite that from my experience looking at laptop with even good hdd protection features like a Fujitsu, they do start showing smart errors. If they are just used for home use, they would be fine I guess. I would not say HDD is that slow, they are pretty tolerable for normal use though you do feel the speed difference. I would generally recommend ssd nowadays even the very cheap ones with lower capacity they are superior for laptop use. The HDD use for storage instead be it putting in into an external drive case or using a cd drive caddy in a laptop if you have one. Taking out the cd drive and using an adapter to install a hdd into the cd drive slot. 12 OS after few tries will get faster - sure if files it uses frequently are located in SS part of that SSHD. Problems will start when cache gets full after few days. After that time, doing any file transfers or operations outside of it will be slower than on 7200RPM drive. Also, If your mom/sister likes to watch movies few times in a row or go back to fav. ones few times a week, they will be transfered to fast cache at some point - which will be awesome for their performance, don't you think ? 13 1 Wouldn't running the OS be faster on the SSHD cache? 2 W7 3 Backblaze statistics show Toshiba and HGST both had comparable or lower rates of failure than Western Digital drives...and HGST has been owned by WD for a while anyways. SSHD would be faster yes, but again no where near as fast as a SSD. Windows 7? then you should be fine honestly, any 7200RPM drive will run it fine and at a descent speed, doesnt really require and SSD it be just a bonus really. Yeah I dont go by those stats at all as its to inconsistent, need it to be equal amount of drives, more drives you have the lesser the failure rate is going to show, its not an accurate test. and this has been shown over and over again year by year. WD might "own" them but they are still a completely different company/factory, dont get confused by that Yeah I dont go by those stats at all as its to inconsistent, need it to be equal amount of drives, more drives you have the lesser the failure rate is going to show, its not an accurate test. 14 SSHD would be faster yes, but again no where near as fast as a SSD. Windows 7? then you should be fine honestly, any 7200RPM drive will run it fine and at a descent speed, doesnt really require and SSD it be just a bonus really. Yes, a SSD is going to be faster than an SSHD or an HDD. But I have a spare SSHD and a spare HDD on hand to use for this old and cheap laptop. I don't have a spare SSD on hand for this unless someone wants to trade me an SSD for my SSHD. Is Windows 10 that much slower than Windows 7 when running on a harddrive? Yeah I dont go by those stats at all as its to inconsistent, need it to be equal amount of drives, more drives you have the lesser the failure rate is going to show, its not an accurate test. and this has been shown over and over again year by year. WD might "own" them but they are still a completely different company/factory, dont get confused by that Yeah I dont go by those stats at all as its to inconsistent, need it to be equal amount of drives, more drives you have the lesser the failure rate is going to show, its not an accurate test. Backblaze has other test years too with more WD vs HGST and Toshiba harddrives. In the 2015 test for example, 1046x WDC WD30EFRX 3TB drives had a failure rate while 1000x HGST HDS723030 3TB drives had a failure rate. In Q4 2016, the WDC 3TB had a failure rate out of 1105x drives, while the HGST HDS72... 3TB had a failure rate of out of 978x drives. According to the charts, more drives does not necessarily equal less failure rate. After you get past a certain number, the extremely lucky and extremely unlucky drives will no longer skewer the average very much, and some very high drive count models have high failure rates while others do not. Seagate had the most drive in 2016 yet the 2nd highest failure rate at Toshiba had the least number of drives at 237 yet a middle-failure rate of HGST had the 2nd most drives yet the lowest failure rate at .60%, and WDC had a higher failure rate as well. In the 2013-2016 chart here, It seems that WDC's 3TB Red series with 1102 drives had a high failure rate at HGST's 3TB drive 1027 drives, had a failure rate less than half that of What Backblaze statistics seems to tell us that model of the harddrive matters more than brands. Some brands such as Seagate have both really good models with low failure failure out of 1889 drives and really bad models with high failures failure out of 4247 drives. The best model of the series seems to be HGST's HDS5C4040BLE640 with drives that only have a failure rate. Last edited Oct 17, 2018 15 Yes, a SSD is going to be faster than an SSHD or an HDD. But I have a spare SSHD and a spare HDD on hand to use for this old and cheap laptop. I don't have a spare SSD on hand for this unless someone wants to trade me an SSD for my SSHD. Is Windows 10 that much slower than Windows 7 when running on a harddrive? Yes it is a big difference, I have experienced this multiple times with many many Clients and my own computers, 10 is very slow on a Mechanical HDD compared to 7. According to the charts, more drives does not necessarily equal less failure rate. No not failure rate but the percentage is less and thats what they are showing, a percentage. More HDD's the less the percentage is. I have been building and doing upgrades and working on peoples computers for almost 15yrs with a base of up to 100 000 people and I havent had to return 1 WD Black hard drive or WD Raptor yet because of normal failure. Ive seen WD Greens and Blues die, but no where near as many as HSGT, Seagate or Toshiba Drives. In the real world you get what you pay for, get a WD Black with 5 yr warranty and you wont regret it, there is a reason why they have 5yr warranty on them. 16 I would ask different question Who the f... in the world did come with an idea to design 5400RPM SSHDD in the first place?! 5400rpm and sshdd both contradict each others' purposes. If the only thing you care about is speed then go with sshdd, otherwise go with anything but seagate. Forgetting backblaze's stats from personal experience i had more failed seagate hdds than from any other manufacturer. 17 Normally I'd stay away from SSHDD and go full SSD but since you want to use what you already have, why not give it a try? Since as you stated, it's for a laptop that will typically see only internet usage and movies, most of what your family member does should be able to fit into the SSD cache portion of that drive. Also, since you have the mechanical drives in hand as well, use one of them to clone the SSHDD and you'll be fine if there's any mechanical failures. Hell, in that instance you could even swap between the drives to see what they prefer which in the end is the most important opinion of them all. Edit Just remember to use the SSHDD in a "normal" manner so it caches what is most accessed by your everyday behavior before truly evaluating its performance. 18 Go ssd or go home If this is not an option, go with the 7200 hdd....especially for the uses you state and since the machine will most likely be plugged in most of the time, the difference in power draw won't matter.... 19 I'd say go with the SSHD. Even at 5400RPM, for normal uses the SSHD will give a better experience than a 7200RPM drive. Plus, if they run the computer off battery the lower power draw of the 5400RPM drive will make the battery last longer. I used one of these 5400RPM SSHDs as a main drive in one of my desktop PCs for the longest time and it worked quite well. Basic tasks like browsing the web, youtube, and Office were much snappier than the 7200RPM hard drive the SSHD replaced. Though, not where near an SSD. Dropping a $30 SSD in a machine as the system drive is one of the best things you can do to wake an older machine up. I would ask different question Who the f... in the world did come with an idea to design 5400RPM SSHDD in the first place?! 5400rpm and sshdd both contradict each others' purposes. All the SSHDs were originally 5400RPM, even WD's. They were done as a compromise for laptop users to still give them the battery life of a 5400RPM drive, but boost the performance. It works quite well in practice actually. 20 If your having to buy these drives new, skip both of them and as many have said above, get a full SSD. Messing about with HDs and SSHDs in a laptop isn't worth the hassle and with the cost of a 120Gb or 240Gb or even 480Gb SSD now being as cheap as they are, I'd never consider even thinking about it and just grab one. Doesn't really matter as such on the make of SSD as any will be much better than a standard SSD or SSHD. Windows 10 on a HD is painful, had one in my laptop, got rid of it even though it was 8 times the size of the SSD I have put in its place 2Tb v 250Gb or something near to 21 So 1/3 of the people here are telling me to use the 5400rpm SSHDs, 1/3 here are telling me to use the 7200 rpm HDDs, and the other 1/3 are telling me to buy a SSD even though I already have the HDD/SSHD on hand. Last edited Oct 17, 2018 22 In that case, do a coin toss between 5400RPM and 7200RPM. Winner gets the job 23 Yes it is a big difference, I have experienced this multiple times with many many Clients and my own computers, 10 is very slow on a Mechanical HDD compared to 7. No not failure rate but the percentage is less and thats what they are showing, a percentage. More HDD's the less the percentage is. I have been building and doing upgrades and working on peoples computers for almost 15yrs with a base of up to 100 000 people and I havent had to return 1 WD Black hard drive or WD Raptor yet because of normal failure. Ive seen WD Greens and Blues die, but no where near as many as HSGT, Seagate or Toshiba Drives. In the real world you get what you pay for, get a WD Black with 5 yr warranty and you wont regret it, there is a reason why they have 5yr warranty on them. Cool story bro, been doing this 20 I would ask different question Who the f... in the world did come with an idea to design 5400RPM SSHDD in the first place?! 5400rpm and sshdd both contradict each others' purposes. If the only thing you care about is speed then go with sshdd, otherwise go with anything but seagate. Forgetting backblaze's stats from personal experience i had more failed seagate hdds than from any other manufacturer. Low cost solution. Bluescreendeath just drop the 5400RPM in and call it a day, it's a general purpose laptop, not specializing in anything, battery life will be more important than super performance. Last edited Oct 17, 2018 24 MQ01ACF050 only has a 16 MB cache which is ridiculously tiny. I wouldn't use that one at all. HTS725050A7 has better sequential performance, lower power consumption, and likely better reliability don't have to worry about MLC wear. ST500LM000 has better random access performance. 25 If you aren't doing too many writes SSHD is the better solution, 7200 rpm drive if you need to write lots of data. Of course I'd suggest a cheap TLC drive, if storage space isn't an issue & price isn't a major concern.

perbedaan hdd 5400rpm dengan 7200rpm